film-terminal-reesennesenesitations-necessary-to-cross-1
The film “Terminal” Review/Opinion/Impression (emphasize the necessary).
Frankly in the cloud, frankly, weak films (this refers to the plot) that come out recently it is very difficult to find something really standing. Of course, there is an exception like alive steel (fun, stupid, nice) or the Devil’s double (simply interesting and original), but basically we see a cloud of special effects of Paphos, and in which such an aspect as the plot serves only with a help and justification, guess what? Right. Pathos and special effects. Therefore, more and more often there is a desire to return to the old solid cinema.
Of course, it would be possible to paint about the steep pillars of the film industry here, but I would like to remember specifically one film that at one time hit me … well, if not for the living, I definitely did not leave indifferently. And this film is not remarkable and the first time the incomprehensible name “terminal”.
The film does not talk about pathos soldiers or other rubbish, he talks about a person who has come to a foreign country for … well, in general, everything in order.
So, what do you think https://sistersitescasino.co.uk/casinos/william-hill-vegas/ can happen to a person at the airport? Banal things like robbery, losing luggage and other unpleasant unpleasant studies of each of us immediately come to mind. But the film begins to amaze with non -standard from the very beginning. So, imagine that you are Vitka: 3
A simple and bizarre person, under the name Valik Navorski (who is not played by the Bezibuscous Tom Henks), a native of the former Republic of the USSR (invented Offers) with a fanciful name to write which I will not dare (it is worth hearing it in the film: 3) you arrive in the country of great opportunities, and you have a couple of simple phrases in a foreign language on a leaf. But as a result of the unforeseen circumstances, his journey will not go further than the airport and fate simply makes the protagonist live. Yes, to live, to create minimal amenities in the so-called “transit zone”, to learn the language on your own and even learn to earn money.
You involuntarily begin to draw a parallel between Victor and Robinson Crusoe. Correct. Robinson was stuck on the island alone, and Victor was among the crowd, the constantly moving crowd of which, by and large, was put on Victor, and for the administration he was nothing more than a bureaucratic mistake that you could not correct and simply would not leave it.
The film tells us the story of a person who found his happiness where others to see only vanity. Everything fit here. And friendship and love and heavy moral choice ..
Throughout the film, Victor is evolving, he turns from a simpleton into a seasoned earrings and a good diplomat who knows the law, but he remains all the same simple -minded good. The only thing that is not very clear is why a Russian (well, or just a Slav) person is portrayed as an adult child. Although sometimes it seemed that the director explains Victor’s “growing up” through the beneficial influence of the West. True, along with this, the fact that the creators are not shy about showing the imperfection of the bureaucratic machine, and this against the background of some narrow -minded films, is very pleasing very pleasing.
In fact, the film is incredibly pleasing, it is funny (thankful), to the best of dramatic and sometimes even make you think. I would like to talk about him more and more, but it will have to stop to avoid spoilers who can ruin the impression of watching this wonderful picture. Watch everyone, here I will go home and check: 3
P.S.This is my first post of this kind to be I ask … to criticize: 3 for learning you need to be on your mistakes.
