clique para habilitar o zoom
carregando...
Não encontramos nenhum resultado
mapa aberto
Visão Roteiro Satélite Híbrido Terrenos Minha localização Tela cheia Anterior Próximo

0 € para 5.600.000 €

Mais opções de Pesquisa
Identificado 0 resultados Ver resultados
Seus resultados de pesquisa

Facts Unfaithfulness Forgiveness: An application of Implicit Theories from Relationships

Postado por editor editor em 17/09/2022
0

Facts Unfaithfulness Forgiveness: An application of Implicit Theories from Relationships

Several knowledge were conducted to recognize variables associated with the hypothetical cheating forgiveness and you may give forgiveness from the influencing implicit theories away from relationship (ITRs; destiny/increases opinions). Studies step 1 examined the relationship between the sort of behaviour, intercourse of forgiver, ITRs and you will cheating forgiveness. Investigation 2 investigated the fresh causal matchmaking ranging from ITRs and you will infidelity forgiveness (as well as connection insecurity because the a great moderator). Abilities showed that men users forgave a husband’s cheating to a greater extent than ladies users which solitary behaviours had been ranked as most forgivable, followed by psychological/caring and technical/online behaviours, and you can intimate/explicit habits since the the very least forgivable. Men players (perhaps not female people) triggered in order to promote increases philosophy forgave a husband’s mental/caring and you can single unfaithfulness in order to a greater the amount than others caused so you’re able to promote destiny thinking; attachment insecurity moderated it matchmaking. These efficiency features extremely important effects for boffins and you may practitioners working with people inside the stress.

Statement

Romantic relationship is very popular and supply different professionals (e.grams., a sense of belonging, improved feelings away from stability/security; Weeks, Gambescia, Jenkins, Reference Months, Gambescia and you can Jenkins 2003; Worthington, Reference Worthington 1998). Even after this type of confident outcomes, cheating costs are alarmingly large, which have lookup quoting that 35–60% out of people have engaged in some kind of being unfaithful behaviour (Thompson O’Sullivan, Resource Thompson and O’Sullivan 2017). These types of rates are more concerning with regards to this new disastrous effects commonly due to cheating (elizabeth.g., physical/mental worry, dating dissolution; Amato Previti, Site Amato and Previti 2003; Whisman, Dixon, Johnson, Site Whisman, Dixon and you can Johnson 1997). Continue Reading

Deixe uma resposta

Seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado.

  • Área

  • Procura Avançada

    0 € para 5.600.000 €

    Mais opções de Pesquisa

Comparar Listagens