Anonymous Essay Slams SUBSTANCE Mag For Alleged Sex Misconduct, Unfair Companies Techniques Toward Ebony Female
“black colored women that make-up over 80% of the team’s employees, include systematically suppressed by cover inequity, sexual harassment, corporate intimidation, intimidation, colorism, and classism.”-Anonymous supply
Substance mag is coming under flames whilst honors its 50th year wedding for allegedly mistreating the dark female employees—only now it is allegedly as a result of additional Ebony girls.
On Sunday (Jun 28) in an anonymous article posted to the media, the author-listed just as “Black Female Anonymous”-discloses unfair companies ways used by the legendary Black publication including intimate misconduct and harassment, unjust wages, and abuse of electricity by older personnel.
“We current ourselves under the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, intimidation, while the maligning of our own mass media careers,” they had written.
“We demand the immediate resignation of Chief Executive Officer Richelieu Dennis, Essence Ventures panel representative and previous substance Communications President Michelle Ebanks, Chief running Officer delight Collins Profet, and main Content Officer Moana Luu. Usually a haven for Black feminine news experts who couldn’t become parts at significant publishers like Hearst and Conde Nast due to racial opinion, the magazine’s first address in-may 1970 boldly presented a Black girl in a natural afro with a tantalizing address line asking Ebony guys, would you love me personally? Now, the firm’s mainly Ebony feminine employees try asking substance itself, will you love you like we like your?”
The scathing article details an allegedly dangerous workplace, before accusing CEO Richelieu Dennis of best support Black females as a“surface-level engagement” but brings that their willpower was directed by “greed and a debaucherous intimate cravings.” The author in addition alleges that Dennis “has a history of sleep with female regarding the Sundial employees” observing that women whom denied their advance are subjected to being “openly sexually harassed them at exclusive company occasions.”
